To the editors: The “Children of the Holocaust” was well written, but somewhat slanted [July 6]. 1 really doubt there could be such a horror here in the USA; for one thing, there are too many constitutional safeguards. However, there are striking parallels between the thirties and today. For example, abortion on demand, greed, drug […]
Author Archives: Tom Mitchell
Why Jews Don’t Smile
To the editors: “Abortion 1990” [September 15] will probably generate many letters both pro and con. Mine will, happily, belong to the latter. It is interesting that, of the many professionals cited in the article, not a few were Jewish (including the author, Mrs. Levinsohn). Roy Eckhardt, in his book Jews and Christians, has a […]
The Value of Children
To the editors: Marla Felcher in her April 7th letter epitomizes a controversy that afflicts the developed world that began with Malthus and has reached its apotheosis in the abortion controversy i.e. the value of children. People choose to procreate for various reasons–not all of them (in my opinion) laudatory. Among these are: 1) the […]
Baby Killers in Hell
To the editors: Matt Groening’s “cartoon” [June 9] is a caricature of traditional Catholic teaching. His pro-choice position displays an ignorance of Catholic moral teachings. If a woman who elects for an abortion feels she is doing the right thing, then she has not violated her conscience. If, however, she goes ahead with it thinking […]
False Hope for Schizophrenics
To the editors: Your Jan. 27th issue had both a letter and an article, the former dealing with the value of psychotherapy (written by a woman who, I would assume, did not suffer from psychosis) and the latter about the trials and tribulations of a schizophrenic named Andy. Karen Hoffman, the letter writer, makes some […]
The Unmoved Mover
To the editors: As a Roman Catholic, I found the article–“A Special Connection With God, Life Among the Lubavitcher Hasidim” [September 2]–to be beautiful and inspiring. I am only sorry that the author, Florence Hamlish Levinsohn, was not moved to the same extent. Tom Mitchell N. Marshfield