• velkr0
  • Makes the most complex issues scrumptious.

A heads-up on Facebook led me to this story, which is supposed to gratifiy me at some level but doesn’t.

The story, reported by TMZ.com: before Mitt Romney’s son Tagg and his wife had twins through a surrogate last year, they signed an agreement that gave them “the right to abort the fetuses in non-life threatening situations … and Mitt Romney covered some of the expenses connected with the arrangement.”

Wow! Such hypocrisy from the Republicans’ pro-life candidate for president! Was it just an oversight, as Tagg Romney’s attorney told TMZ, that the pro-choice clause wasn’t removed from the agreement? Might have been. Did Mitt Romney have any idea what the agreement said when he anted up? Who knows?

But you know what? Paragons of pro-life virtue do have a way of getting around their own rhetoric when it’s family, don’t they?

So lap it up, progressives.