To the editors:
My sincerest apologies to the New Duncan Imperials [Letters, April 13]. My letter [March 30] was intended to be a comment on the quality of the review [Critics Choice, March 2], not the quality of the band. I never meant to imply that the band was not good, only that the review was not good. I was commenting on the quality of the critic’s writing, not the band’s playing. I’m sorry that the irony which I intended was not obvious enough. Again, my apologies.